0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.37	% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
0.10/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 12:57:24 UTC 2026
0.10/0.38	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.38	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.43	Running higher-order theorem proving
5.03/5.37	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BqIuQosIGa/E---3.1_3677348.p
9.24/7.95	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
9.24/7.95	% partial match(3): HMLLSMSLSSMCHSA
9.24/7.95	% Preprocessing class: HMLLSLLLSSLCHSA.
9.24/7.95	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 179 seconds (1432 total)
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_ho_10 with 895s (5) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting sh5l with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_bool_1 with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_bool_2 with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% new_bool_2 with pid 3677365 completed with status 0
9.24/7.95	% Result found by new_bool_2
9.24/7.95	% partial match(3): HMLLSMSLSSMCHSA
9.24/7.95	% Preprocessing class: HMLLSLLLSSLCHSA.
9.24/7.95	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 179 seconds (1432 total)
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_ho_10 with 895s (5) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting sh5l with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_bool_1 with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_bool_2 with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
9.24/7.95	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
9.24/7.95	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
9.24/7.95	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 179 seconds (179 total)
9.24/7.95	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% SubtermCWHack with pid 3677366 completed with status 0
9.24/7.95	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
9.24/7.95	% partial match(3): HMLLSMSLSSMCHSA
9.24/7.95	% Preprocessing class: HMLLSLLLSSLCHSA.
9.24/7.95	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 179 seconds (1432 total)
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_ho_10 with 895s (5) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting sh5l with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_bool_1 with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% Starting new_bool_2 with 179s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
9.24/7.95	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
9.24/7.95	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-DHSFFSBN
9.24/7.95	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 179 seconds (179 total)
9.24/7.95	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
9.24/7.95	% Preprocessing time       : 0.035 s
9.24/7.95	
9.24/7.95	% Proof found!
9.24/7.95	% SZS status Theorem
9.24/7.95	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
9.24/7.95	thf(decl_sort1, type, produc3658429121746597890et_nat: $tType).
9.24/7.95	thf(decl_sort2, type, assn: $tType).
9.24/7.95	thf(decl_27, type, abs_assn: (produc3658429121746597890et_nat > $o) > assn).
9.24/7.95	thf(decl_28, type, rep_assn: assn > produc3658429121746597890et_nat > $o).
9.24/7.95	thf(decl_1501, type, x: assn).
9.24/7.95	thf(decl_1502, type, y: assn).
9.24/7.95	thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((((x)!=(y))&((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[X2429:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ X2429))&((rep_assn @ x @ X2429))))))))<=>(((y)!=(abs_assn @ (^[X2430:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ X2430))&((rep_assn @ x @ X2430)))))))&((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[X2431:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ X2431))&((rep_assn @ x @ X2431))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.BqIuQosIGa/E---3.1_3677348.p', conj_0)).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((((x)!=(y))&((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[X2429:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ X2429))&((rep_assn @ x @ X2429))))))))<=>(((y)!=(abs_assn @ (^[X2430:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ X2430))&((rep_assn @ x @ X2430)))))))&((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[X2431:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ X2431))&((rep_assn @ x @ X2431)))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(((((x)!=(y))&((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0))))))))<=>(((y)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))&((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ((((x)=(y))|((x)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|(((y)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))))&(((((y)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)!=(y)))&(((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)!=(y))))&((((y)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0))))))))&(((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0))))))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (((x)=(y))|((y)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (((y)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)!=(y))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((x)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (((y)=(x))|((y)=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))|((x)!=(abs_assn @ (^[Z0:produc3658429121746597890et_nat]:((((rep_assn @ y @ Z0))&((rep_assn @ x @ Z0)))))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((y)!=(x)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])])).
9.24/7.95	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_7]), c_0_7])]), c_0_9]), ['proof']).
9.24/7.95	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
9.24/7.95	% Parsed axioms                        : 11329
9.24/7.95	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 10672
9.24/7.95	% Initial clauses                      : 993
9.24/7.95	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 23
9.24/7.95	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 970
9.24/7.95	% Processed clauses                    : 5786
9.24/7.95	% ...of these trivial                  : 614
9.24/7.95	% ...subsumed                          : 3751
9.24/7.95	% ...remaining for further processing  : 1420
9.24/7.95	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 187
9.24/7.95	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
9.24/7.95	% Backward-subsumed                    : 65
9.24/7.95	% Backward-rewritten                   : 94
9.24/7.95	% Generated clauses                    : 30377
9.24/7.95	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21916
9.24/7.95	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
9.24/7.95	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 7
9.24/7.95	% Paramodulations                      : 30047
9.24/7.95	% Factorizations                       : 24
9.24/7.95	% NegExts                              : 0
9.24/7.95	% Equation resolutions                 : 192
9.24/7.95	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
9.24/7.95	% Total rewrite steps                  : 12051
9.24/7.95	% ...of those cached                   : 9700
9.24/7.95	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional check models        : 0
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
9.24/7.95	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
9.24/7.95	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
9.24/7.95	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
9.24/7.95	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
9.24/7.95	% Current number of processed clauses  : 1191
9.24/7.95	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 383
9.24/7.95	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
9.24/7.95	%    Negative unit clauses             : 177
9.24/7.95	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 625
9.24/7.95	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16793
9.24/7.95	% ...number of literals in the above   : 35784
9.24/7.95	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
9.24/7.95	% Current number of archived clauses   : 179
9.24/7.95	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 75513
9.24/7.95	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 60250
9.24/7.95	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1782
9.24/7.95	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10107
9.24/7.95	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
9.24/7.95	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 870
9.24/7.95	% BW rewrite match successes           : 139
9.24/7.95	% Condensation attempts                : 0
9.24/7.95	% Condensation successes               : 0
9.24/7.95	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 503224
9.24/7.95	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 111681
9.24/7.95	
9.24/7.95	% -------------------------------------------------
9.24/7.95	% User time                : 0.921 s
9.24/7.95	% System time              : 0.088 s
9.24/7.95	% Total time               : 1.009 s
9.24/7.95	% Maximum resident set size: 33268 pages
9.24/7.95	
9.24/7.95	% -------------------------------------------------
9.24/7.95	% User time                : 2.424 s
9.24/7.95	% System time              : 0.130 s
9.24/7.95	% Total time               : 2.554 s
9.24/7.95	% Maximum resident set size: 29184 pages
9.24/7.95	% E exiting
9.24/7.95	EOF